Over 70 climate scientists and journalists say NO to Phoney Parrot

Not that those most familiar with climate science have any sway with Twit and the corrupt Repugnantan Party. Their only concern is protecting and enriching the fossil fuel companies that pay bribes to them. From this article reporting the letter of the above signed:

"At the moment when the facts of the case were presented to her, this arbiter of justice freely chose to side with mistruths. Judge Coney Barrett’s responses are factually inaccurate, scientifically unsound, and dangerous. How can Judge Coney Barrett rule on pending issues of climate change liability, regulation, finance, mitigation, equity, justice, and accountability if she fails to accept even the underlying premise of global warming? The answer is that she cannot. [...] Judge Coney Barrett has displayed a profound inability to understand the ecological crisis of our times, and in so doing she enables it."