The following is my response to Hanzi Freinacht's recent FB post.
Correct
me if I'm wrong but it seems social liberalism 2.0 requires that
societies like the Nordic need to be the most 'progressive' or social
liberalism 1.0 as prerequisite. So why then are some so determined to
jump to 2.0 when their society is far from 1.0? It seems we first need
to get up to speed with 1.0 to set the necessary conditions for 2.0 to
be enacted.
Specially
in the US, it seems we were much closer to 1.0 during the FDR era. That
continued up to the Reagan era when we started to regress, when the
oligarchy became predominant and our government subservient to it. Hence
the likes of Bernie Sanders and AOC are a move to return to that sort
of social liberalism. Though they have to challenge not only the
Republican Party but the corrupt establishment in their own Party. The
latter has been evident for some time but slowly progressives like them
are making electoral advancements adding to the Congressional
Progressive Caucus with each election. If that trend continues then they
will have a majority soon at least in the House.
In
practical terms then it appears the US needs to focus on getting back
to 1.0 in order to set the preconditions necessary to move into 2.0 and
we're working on it. But overeager idealists think we can somehow just
jump to 2.0 and ignore the necessary preconditions. And some think
returning to and establishing a strong 1.0 progressive base is a
regression, or worse some negative form of socialism and to be shunned.
They think we need to be 'post-progressive' before we are even
progressive again. We need to get over all this 'post' talk, which is
more like impractical pipe dreams evaporating like smoke into the void.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.