Good article by Daniel Christian Wahl. I support bioregionalism as the solution. I just have questions about some of the theory in the piece. For example, while acknowledging the need for different solutions in bioregions given their unique diversity, nevertheless there is an overall, global integration at "higher levels of complexity [...] achieved through the evolution of novel forms of cooperation and the weaving of syntropic relationships."
Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, linguistic framing, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It's not much but it's something.
Bioregional regeneration for planetary health
That
sounds right to me, given the path we've been on exemplifies an
"abstracting, generalising, norming, reductive, mechanistic" approach.
And yet this syntropic web of relationships is still using the fractal
model of "redundancy at different scales," to me indicative of the old
approach. As I argued in this paper, that sort of fractal, scale-free
redundancy does not align with statistical studies of the diversity of
numerous networks under examination. As I suggested, then perhaps a web
of 'synplex' relationships does not have that sort of fractal
integration, but certainly a syntegration with different axiomatic principals.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Songs, lyrics, poems
Songs, lyrics, poems and other writing/media
Here are about a dozen songs I've recorded at YouTube.* And this link is to my lyrics and poems folder at Google docs, mostly from my ...

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.