According
to the following article it seems that consciousness evolved to handle
the 'pathological complexity' problem. The key for this solution appears
to be the development of our feeling valence that allowed for an
evolutionary functional fit with our environment. (Sounds a lot like
Damasio here).
It also seems that the crux of the problem is how our 'false' reasoning takes a regressive step back into pathological complexity because of its obsession with ever more abstraction that dissociates from our feeling valence necessary to what Lakoff calls 'real reason.'
"This
article introduces and defends the ‘pathological complexity thesis’ as a
hypothesis about the evolutionary origins of minimal consciousness, or
sentience, that connects the study of animal consciousness closely with
work in behavioural ecology and evolutionary biology. I argue that
consciousness is an adaptive solution to a design problem that led to
the extinction of complex multicellular animal life following the Avalon
explosion and that was subsequently solved during the Cambrian
explosion. This is the economic trade-off problem of having to deal with
a complex body with high degrees of freedom, what I call ‘pathological
complexity’. By modeling the explosion of this computational complexity
using the resources of state-based behavioral and life-history theory we
will be able to provide an evolutionary bottom-up framework to make
sense of subjective experience and its function in nature by paying
close attention to the ecological lifestyles of different animals."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.