Unlike negative propaganda which uses lies and manipulation, we can construct positive propaganda using truth and facts. But the latter needs to understand the science of narrative structure as well as the former does to communicate effectively. "Just the facts ma'am" doesn't cut it for most of us. Continuing this post:
Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, linguistic framing, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
The science of stories
D.
Jones, M., Anderson Crow, D. (2017). "How can we use the ‘science of
stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories?" Palgrave
Communications 3:53. Abstract:
"The
core goal of the science communicator is to convey accurate scientific
information—to help people update existing understandings of the world
and to change those understandings when necessary. However, science
communicators, with their often extensive scientific training and
educations, are often socialized into educating with information derived
from scientific works in a way that mirrors the values of science
itself. They do this by primarily relying on an approach termed the
Knowledge Deficit Model, a model of communicating that emphasizes the
repetition of emotionless objectively sterile information to increase
understanding. The problem with this approach is that people do not
actually make decisions or process information based on only objective
scientific evidence. Their personal beliefs and emotional understandings
of the world also play a powerful role. In this article we argue that
to better connect with audiences communicators would do well to
recognize themselves as storytellers–not to distort the truth, but to
help people to connect with problems and issues on a more human level in
terms of what matters to them. We reference extant narrative persuasion
scholarship in public policy and elsewhere to offer a step-by-step
guide to narrating scientific evidence. We argue that through
understanding the structure of a narrative, science communicators can
engage in the policy process, remaining true to the tenets of science
and maintaining the integrity of the evidence, but doing so in a way
that is compelling and thus also effective in helping solve problems."
Aka Edwyrd theurj Burj. Provoking and propagating progressive populism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Songs, lyrics, poems
Songs, lyrics, poems and other writing/media
Here are about a dozen songs I've recorded at YouTube.* And this link is to my lyrics and poems folder at Google docs, mostly from my ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.