Will Supreme Corp eliminate administrative expertise?

The case before them is whether to leave the precedent of the Chevron decision in place. That doctrine gives administrative agencies the power to interpret legislation and enact regulations based on the hiring of experts trained in the issues at hand. According to this observer of the oral arguments, it seems likely the Corp will likely discard Chevron, thereby leaving such determinations to courts based not on expertise but on biased political agendas. 

And of course if legislatures had to limits laws to only minutely specific circumstances of which they have no expertise, then again its more a matter of political bias. Which seems exactly what the corporations want, since they are the ones bribing politicians and courts to get their way and avoid those burdensome regulations that require of them to be responsible citizens. The end of expertise and the administrative state is exactly what this case is about and we can see the writing on the Supreme Corp's wall. 

Also see Project 2025 where Heritage Foundation is up front about it.