Our legitimate fear is based on medical science. Theirs are are not.
Aka Propulism. Our house is on fire. Join the resistance: Do no harm/take no shit. My idiosyncratic and confluent bricolage of progressive politics, linguistic framing, the collaborative commons, next generation cognitive neuroscience, American pragmatism, de/reconstruction, dynamic systems, embodied realism, psychodynamics, aesthetics. It ain't much but it's not nothing.
The below is a statement of the false notion of trying to work or compromise with Repugnacon's in Congress, as that Party has gone full fascist. Our only hope is to strongly defeat them at every turn, not weakly surrender to accepting it as just another opinion to be honored in some fantasy ideal of unity. Our unity comes in defeating fascism, which now includes the Repugnacon Party.
"Or ending the filibuster." You said it Bernie. Now stick to it.
Bernie has always been our champion. Let's give him the courage and fortitude to keep up the good fight. It's our turn to be there for him. #DontKillItBernie
Of course not. Granted their goals and values are despicable but you have to give it to them that they will fight tooth and nail to get what they want. Meanwhile the Dems 'might' have their heart in the right place but do not have any fight in them when they encounter the least resistance from the fascists. What a sad, sick situation.
Mickey Edwards had this to say:
"The Republican party really no longer stands for any kind of principles, conservative or otherwise. The party seems now to be completely following the lead of one man wherever he goes, which is the definition of a cult. Now all that matters is, ‘Trump is for this, we’re for this.’ And that includes denying truth, denying fact, denying reality. It’s such a disconnect from what’s really happened in the world. [They] are living in an alternate reality in which facts don’t matter, the Constitution doesn’t matter."
This FB post doesn't think so.
Let him hear from you: https://tyt.com/petitions/dontkillitbernie. Also info@berniesanders.com and https://www.sanders.senate.gov/contact/
Excellent question. Sirota has some relevant and insightful comments. Reasons which, of course, are why we hate the establishment and why Twitler was elected in the first place. And why we're going right back there again because the establishment Democrats simply cannot understand this.
"The motives here are unstated but obvious: nobody in either party or in the Washington media wants to center Tanden’s nomination on her actual record, because if that record becomes disqualifying for career advancement in Washington, it could set a precedent jeopardizing the personal career prospects of every creature slithering through the Washington swamp.
"Indeed, if corruption, mismanagement, bullying, union busting and let-them-eat-cake-style austerity ideology are suddenly perceived negatively, then all the real-life Veep characters in Washington – the politicians, operatives and media elites who’ve spent their whole lives angling for fancy White House titles – could be out of luck.
"Appreciating the power of this tribal motivation is crucial, because it accounts for why Democrats seem to be spending as much or more political capital on trying to rescue Tanden’s nomination than on enacting policies to rescue Americans from an economic disaster. That’s no overstatement: the White House has signaled it is working the phones and pulling out all the stops for the OMB nominee at the very same time the administration is signaling a potential pre-emptive retreat on the minimum wage and a willingness to limit promised survival checks."
She makes perfect sense to anyone with any sense. I can see why it makes no sense to Repugnacons. It's why we must not compromise with but defeat them if we really want to heal our planet and help our people.
And now with Moscow Mitch backing Twitler again this is apparently just what he wants.
"Far-right extremists are threatening to 'blow up' the U.S. Capitol during President Biden’s State of the Union address in hopes of killing dozens of members of Congress, a top security official told lawmakers on Thursday."
Or rather he's always been fascist but now he's back to admitting it again. And proving his apparent rebuke of Twitler was as usual just lying spin. McTurtle is now saying he'd back Twit again if he's the Presidential nominee in 2024. Meaning of course his fascism lost the first time and they want to try again. And there is certainly no doubt that Twit is dropping any pretense of going full fascist next time. So too is the Repugnacon Party.
Sirota reports that Harris has the power according to a memo circulating on Capitol Hill but White House Chief of Staff Klain already said they will not overrule the Parliamentarian: "Certainly that’s not something we would do. We’re going to honor the rules of the system and work within that system to get this bill passed." Which is weird that they will honor one Senate rule to eliminate the wage hike but ignore another rule where it would put the hike in the Bill. Honestly I'm sick of the same old from Democrats who claim to be on our side but refuse to fight for us.
According to this article now supporters of the wage hike need 60 votes to overrule the Parliamentarian, thus giving cover for Democrats to cower. But that is not true damn it. As noted previously and verified, the President of the Senate can overrule the Parliamentarian since the latter only advises the former who has the actual authority. In that case then 60 votes are needed to overrule the President, and the opposition does not have the votes for that.
Do not accept this fake excuse that this issue is over. We demand that the Democrats use the above Senate rule to get this wage increase in Reconciliation. And if they do not then it's time to replace them, for they have the power to do it and if they won't do it now their verbal support is empty and quite frankly insulting. No excuses: DO IT!
Even if we get the wage hike in, we might lose the majority vote on the Bill. But that would put extra pressure on both Manchin and Sinema to scrap the entire Bill and are they willing to do that? I think if we get it in the Bill then we can apply enormous pressure on both of them to pass the entire Bill, given the severity of the need for it right now.
This one bubbled up to awareness today. No worries mate.
1980. Funny how one who perceives things more clearly can be labeled insane because we just don't want to accept those insights.
From this FB post:
It's the Repugnacon way. Wake the f___ America, they hate you and will do everything in their power to suppress you for a buck.
"After record turnout in 2020, Republican-controlled states appear to be in a race to the bottom to see who can pass the most egregious new barriers to voting. According to a new analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice, 253 bills to restrict voting access have been introduced in 43 states already this year. Georgia is ground zero for the GOP’s escalating war on voting, targeting the voting methods that were used most by Democratic voters in 2020 and which contributed to flipping the state blue and electing two Democratic senators."
The PostBastard was defiant in Congressional hearings, telling legislators TFB that you don't like me but I'm staying "so get used to it." Not so fast wanker. Biden filled the three empty seats on the PO Board, thus giving it a majority of those likely to oust him. The new three are a former Deputy Postmaster General, a former general counsel of the American Postal Union and a mail voting advocate. Buh bye you corporate toy.
About getting fired through the mail because he'll never get it. He was specifically hired to make the PO work as badly as possible to provide justification for privatizing it. He and the PO Board that hired him must all be fired, and quickly Joe.
~1975. This is the first song I ever wrote. And it is a short one. I was living in The Vault, an apartment above a bank, with some musicians. I decided to pick up a guitar and learned to play at least some chords to go with the lyrics and melody.
She breaks down the pathetic manipulation of identity by Tanden defenders. Joy Gray certainly finds identity to be legitimate, but not in Tanden's case since her entire career is about destroying those marginalized identity protections which she claims helped her. Same goes for her defenders, trying to deflect away from Tanden's actual and atrocious history of corporate corruption. A tactic, btw, Biden also uses to defend his other horrific Cabinet picks: "Yeah but they're black or women." Sure, but also corporatists hell bent on destroying democratic protections for money.
Her first song was Motley Crue's Live Wire. So Katie asks her to sing some soul, so she then sings some Sarah Vaughn. Quite a moving performance for this 15-year old.
Even if it is by Manchin and Repugs with some progressives ironically dissenting, she'll take this win since it means corporacrat Tanden won't get a job meant for a peoples' representative. Joe ducked fup on this one.
Rising documents all of Tanden's ass-kissing Democratic defenders using misdirecting identity politics, including Biden via his Press Secretary. So why are they still sticking with this corporate lackey when they do not have the votes to get her nomination approved? Bottom line: It's payback for all the money Tanden has raised for the Party, period. Same old corrupt politics that got Twitler elected in the first place and that Biden promised was over. And if you believe that one...
1997. This is the opening incantation to a ritual in which I participated. I used the imagery from Wesoterica and the Tarot Major Arcana.
Related to the Capitol attack. This report focuses on the legality of that seizure and not on the fact that this could prove who in Congress conspired with insurrection. The FBI rightly claims that they used emergency powers given the severity of the issue. And we the people want the evidence of who in Congress conspired with this treason so that they can be duly prosecuted under the law.
Injustice Thomas wrote a scathing dissent in the recent Corp ruling to reject further challenges to PA election cases. He claims that even though there was no proof of voter fraud via mail ballots nonetheless there could have been but it just wasn't detected. Therefore we must eliminate mail-in ballots for most people.
In essence he is supporting Twit's claims that the election was rigged and giving ammunition to Repug State legislatures to ban mail voting. Which, by the way, they are already doing. We simply must expand the Corp to prevent this fascist takeover or we will indeed lose what little democracy we have left.
In a strange, ironic twist Manchin is the one saving us from Tanden getting Senate approval for the head of the Office of Management and Budget. It's weird though because Manchin is a Corporacrat and they're the ones who typically love Tanden's own corporate ass-kissing.
Weirder still, some progressive voices are now defending Tanden, like the Executive Director of Justice Democrats Rojas who thinks Tanden will go big on progressive issues, and President of NARAL Hogue who claims Tanden is a committed progressive. Seriously, WTF? Krystal explains.
No to government regulations. Yes to government bail outs. They really are despicable and yes, evil.
"Texas Republicans will use federal funds to help pay exorbitant energy bills hitting ordinary Texans after a deep freeze crippled the state this week."
To the Manhattan District Attorney. This is how you convict a mob boss. Twit is going down for tax crimes and I can't wait.
"The Supreme Court on Monday rejected former president Donald Trump’s last-chance effort to keep his private financial records from the Manhattan district attorney, ending a long and drawn-out legal battle."
Excellent breakdown of the indirect kind of trans bigotry exemplified by Rowling. It's a complex and lengthy video but well worth the time to understand much of the broader bigotry hiding behind claims for free speech and against political correctness and cancel culture.
"Indirect bigotry manifests as 'concern' or 'debate' about a host of proxy issues. It's often defensive in tone rather than offensive. Frequently the claim is that a once needed liberation movement has now gone too far, that it's now the activists who are the new oppressors, who are disturbing law and order with violent and chaotic protests, who are victimizing and silencing innocent people by calling the bigots. Who are infiltrating the media and replacing good old-fashioned entertainment with politically correct propaganda [...] because cancel culture is out of control and free speech is under attack" (22:02).
Yes, Bernie made a good case that the $15 minimum wage meets the requirements of the Byrd Rule so that it can be in the Reconciliation Bill. But why are Democrats, including Bernie, accepting the Byrd Rule in the first place when they can easily overrule it? And why is TYT just accepting it as necessary too?
They instead need to report on how we override the Byrd Rule to get what we want in a Reconciliation Bill. The Parliamentarian only advises the President of the Senate. The latter can overrule that advice. In that case it requires 60 Senators to overrule the President's decision and they don't have the votes. It's time for Dems to play legislative hardball. Why they are not in this case is indefensible.
BTW: The conservative National Review even acknowledges that this procedure is part of Senate Rules. But they claim that it would be atrocious to use it to overrule Byrd. This hypocrisy is ludicrous since the Repugs have made a mockery of any Senate rule that gets in their way to what they want.
Ego Nwodim's song about how quarantine is driving us all loco. It's about time they're giving her some prime time on the show.
Biden's spiel is on the promises he made to achieve unification. So what about this broken promise? Do we just let it pass with the excuse of not rocking the Democratic Party boat because they profess unification? Hell no. We progressives hold him to his promises and if he can't keep them we vote him out too.
See the ACLU's full statement here.
A key in the transition away from rampant fossil fuel use is public transportation, and preferably electric at that. This meme highlights a difference in cultural norms about how we define ourselves in that regard.
According to this paper published in Environmental Research (2021) as discussed in this article. This is the very definition of genocide yet we're conditioned not to see that reality because it's just the cost of doing business. We must wake up and demand that our governments aggressively take up renewable energy and quickly phase out fossil fuels. These unnecessary and intentional deaths are simply not acceptable in any humane society.
"Air pollution caused by the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil was responsible for 8.7m deaths globally in 2018, a staggering one in five of all people who died that year, new research has found. Countries with the most prodigious consumption of fossil fuels to power factories, homes and vehicles are suffering the highest death tolls, with the study finding more than one in 10 deaths in both the US and Europe were caused by the resulting pollution, along with nearly a third of deaths in eastern Asia, which includes China. Death rates in South America and Africa were significantly lower."
This is what a real representative of the people sounds like. Quite the contrast with Texas government, eh? Note that this aid is going to anyone who needs it, no questions asked. No means testing or other ineffective austerity BS standing in the way.
See this post as preface. The study notes that it's predominantly low and lower-income communities that have the most student debt and would benefit the most from some debt forgiveness. The higher income brackets going to Harvard and Yale are miniscule to non-existent for such debt. What's your next fake excuse Joe?
"Because low- and lower-middle income communities see the worst debt-to-income ratios, they would see the largest portion of their income freed up through student debt forgiveness. Young adult borrowers in low- and lower-middle income communities would receive an outsized share of forgiveness in aggregate dollars compared to middle- and upper-income communities."
Early 1980s, for my daughter.
While the Repugs are busy laying false blame to others for their own mismanagement of their energy grid, AOC was busy raising more than $1 million to help struggling Texans affected by this disaster. Remember that Texans when it comes time to vote again.
"Announced on Twitter early Thursday evening by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the grassroots fundraising campaign brought in more than $1 million in a matter of hours—all of which, according to the New York Democrat, will go to The Bridge Homeless Recovery Center, Ending Community Homeless Coalition (ECHO), Family Eldercare, Houston Food Bank, Feeding Texas, and other local groups assisting Texans during the ongoing emergency."
Tom Murray [1] makes the point that complexity isn’t the answer to everything. It has it place and usefulness but to make it the keystone that holds together everything else creates problems. Following are some examples from the US political system, where for liberals complexity is indeed the Philosopher’s Stone.
Sirota [2] gives a history lesson on complexity and the Democrats. They went from a Party protecting labor with simple framing on fairness and universalism with programs like social security, Medicare and public education to fetishizing “best-and-brightest technocrats and business neoliberals whose obsession with hair-splitting precision and corporate fealty ended up fetishizing ever-more complex means testing while largely accepting tax inequity.” This resulted in a “byzantine maze of complexity, paperwork and bureaucracy” that threw universal fairness out the window and let white collar and corporate criminals off the hook. It’s a stark lesson that complexity is far from the answer to everything. And in many cases it makes real-life situations far worse when simple solutions could do the job equitably. It’s a lesson elite Democrats should learn but cannot given their obsessive worship of the ever spiraling shibboleth of complexity.
Thomas Frank [3] makes a similar point. He discusses the meritocracy of the professional class and why it has consistently failed the American people. Frank is not opposed to expertise per se, just the orthodox meritocracy that is defined by establishment standards. He compares them to some of the experts of FDR’s administration. While some of them did indeed have some more establishment credentials, many were mavericks that challenged the establishment’s policies as well as what the very term expertise meant. It was more an expertise of the streets rather than the ivory towers, one that came from living the life of the people rather than the privileged life of the professional class. So under the professional liberal meritocracy their social class always does quite well. The rest of us not so much.
In Frank’s Frank’s book Listen Liberal [4] it is interesting to note that the liberal shift to expertise and complexity with the McGovern Commission sets a sociological background for key elements of the AQAL movement. Complexity came to be valued for its own sake. But it was a complexity that dissociated from its foundations in that the highly educated professions came to look down on the working class as deserving of their fate because they weren’t educated or smart enough. It was a dissociation from its ‘base,’ so to speak.
This was further supported by the ideology backing the professional class, with language of superior states like absolute reason or the soul being elevated beyond the mortal coil of toil and degradation. E.g., false reason in Lakoff’s terms. We can see this same dynamic in AQALingus as well, a top-down cream of the crop leading us lower level humans to the promised land not by making our material conditions better (how crass) but by selling us an ideology that will transform how we perceive and interpret those conditions. Thing is, those conditions have only gotten worse since this ‘liberal enlightenment’ of the upper classes.
Bill Clinton was a significant player in this shift to the neoliberal center. Back then documents even proudly used the neoliberal label. It was a conscious acceptance that the status quo was just fine. And that what was necessary was for individuals to be educated in new skills for the new corporate/information economy. There was no questioning the inherent inequalities or corruption in that system. Consequently, if one didn’t pursue the requisite education then their lot was their own fault. There was no analysis of how the system was rigged against such attainment. Even back then in Clinton’s first administration Robert Reich signed on to this canard. Obviously Reich has since changed his tune.
Another key fact is that Clinton talked like he still supported the working class to get their votes. But his policies per the above ideological shift in the Party were quite to the contrary. We can reasonably assume his wife, Hillary, was privy to and in agreement with this shift, since she has a record in the Senate and as Secretary of State supporting this inference. And she too, like her husband, is spinning the worker rhetoric yet coming from the same neoliberal, corporate view that dominates the establishment Dems. As but one example, her cronies on the Dem platform committee refused to support a plank that would guarantee a rejection of the TPP.
In this [5] interview Frank starts by saying that the Democratic Party still will not accept his analysis of why they lost so many elections. He then discusses how media like the Washington Post, mouthpiece of the Party, refuses to even broach certain topics like what Sanders promoted: single-payer healthcare, free college, renegotiating the trade deals, questioning globalization etc. You know, routine progressive ideas that the majority of Americans support. The Party just won’t hear it. Hence their so-called Better Deal is the same rehashed corporatism with empty promises that throws a few meatless bones to the masses.
Like Tom advises, we need to use complexity where it is applicable and beware of using it where it is not. Like the obsessed Democrats above we can muck things up by imposing complex solutions where a simple screwdriver does the trick. The wisdom is in knowing the difference.
Notes
1. https://www.perspegrity.com/papers/MM_Reader_chap_Murray.pdf
2. https://www.dailyposter.com/p/reminder-this-never-ends-well
3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=a9reU6RdD_M&fbclid=IwAR3vzVSk2EbDXeX98xzG-H7Gev_P1LdMY7L-rTEWw1VSdgYq2fFUdVyfNEg
4. Frank, T. (2017) Listen Liberal. Picador: New York.
5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqvpePm_yiI&fbclid=IwAR05F-4iC-vLBdTX6MxrTbOlax93YJa6xElwzd9VSk5X3eVxUQb96Io-8c0
Here are about a dozen songs I've recorded at YouTube.* And this link is to my lyrics and poems folder at Google docs, mostly from my ...