Continuing this post, Sinha (2021) further differentiates cognitive linguistics' roots, which lean more toward Vygotsky than Piaget.
"Piaget
was a universalist: he claimed that all children progressed through the
same developmental stages, only the rate of development being
influenced by social and cultural factors. For Vygotsky, by contrast,
'higher psychological functions' (including memory and reasoning) are
shaped by the cultural forms that they take in any given society, and
are semiotically mediated— that is, it is the acquisition and use of
linguistic and other signs that enables the development of the
psychological function" (390).
Also
of interest in the Dawn of Everything debate is that, since Vygotsky
claimed that "human cognition is embodied not only in the brain, but
also in the products of material and symbolic culture," then Cole and
his colleagues noted:
"Beyond
the idea of a uniform distinction between more and less ‘advanced’
societies, and between ‘logical’ and ‘non- logical’ thinking, they
focused instead on the ways in which transcultural cognitive resources
are brought to bear on different problem areas, in different contexts of
reasoning and communication. Their 'major conclusion' was that
'cultural differences in cognition reside more in the situations to
which particular cognitive processes are applied than in the existence
of a process in one cultural group and its absence in another” (390).
Sinha,
C. (2021). "Culture in language and cognition." The Routledge Handbook
of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 387 - 408
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.